I will be affirmative team so i must to agree with the Motion. oke may be some of you still dont understand about What is Death Sentence and drug ...?
A drug is, in the broadest of terms, a chemical substance that has known biological effects on humans or other animals.[5] Foods are generally excluded from this definition, in spite of their physiological effects on animal species.[6][7][8]
In pharmacology, a drug is "a chemical substance used in the treatment, cure, prevention, or diagnosis of disease or used to otherwise enhance physical or mental well-being."[6] Pharmaceutical drugs may be used for a limited duration, or on a regular basis for chronic disorders.[9]
Psychoactive drugs are chemical substances that affect the function of the nervous system, altering perception, mood or consciousness.[10] Alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine are the most widely consumed psychoactive drugs worldwide.[11]
Capital punishment, death penalty or execution is punishment by death. The sentence that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (referring to execution by beheading)
Capital punishment has, in the past, been practiced by most societies, as a punishment for criminals, and political or religious dissidents. Historically, the carrying out of the death sentence was often accompanied by torture, and executions were most often public
Waste of a life and lots of other points
First of all, drug dealing is a crime that involves the unauthorised sale of certain consumable substances, such as marijuana and heroin. A drug dealer is a person who sells the controlled substances. The unauthorised sale of prescription medication can also be considered as drug dealing, and in some cases may be a major problem in some communities, which is why a punishment should most definitely be given to the dealer, but the question is should we really be executing these people for only selling the drug, and instead giving a punishment?Elaborating on the point made now, which is also one of my points to make, in certain countries illegal importing, exporting, sale or possession of drugs constitute capital offences that may result in the death penalty. According to a 2011 article by the Lawyers Collective, and NGO in India, they say that, ’32 countries impose capital punishment for offences involving narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.’ So my point to make here is that, once again there is no reason to execute people who were only doing an act that was illegal. To elaborate further, let’s take for example that a man murdered another man, then the murderer would be taken to jail for the rest of their life, and might come out of jail in 20 years rather than their whole life…. So if you think about the murderer had killed someone and yet was not executed…but If we take the drug dealer they would be executed for doing a small illegal act.
Now to my second point regarding the topic, about what happens when the drug is legalised. When the drug is legalised, law enforcement realise that if the drug dealer lived longer, their crime wouldn’t be real. Unless that person had committed mass murder. As I was saying earlier, there isn’t really a reason for the execution of a minor criminal who sold an illicit substance. So therefore the death penalty for drug dealers is not valid.
So to recap briefly on what I was talking about, drug dealers convicted of distributing large amounts of drugs should not receive the death penalty, because people should only receive the death penalty for taking life or, in some cases, attempting to. Though convicted of committing a major crime, it would be wrong for these drug dealers to receive capital punishment. This gives them no chance to regret and make a contribution to society.
And also, how does that benefit anyone?, executing someone for a minor criminal act, should definitely not be a reason for execution.
This is a victimless crime - education and rehabilitation are needed for all.
Drugs are a choice. Where there is demand there is supply! So killing drug dealers/traffickers is not the answer. The answer is in a good sound education from a young age. This will lift them out of poverty status and give them a better income to support themselves and their families as well as bring up children who are educated and know the good from the bad. For drug addicts, rehabilitation is the answer. They would need help from their Government as well as other donors to help facilitate the building of rehabilitation centers and for people who have had that past drug experience to educate the addicts and give them a sense of purpose to stop them from using again.and many other...
this is the argemet from agree poeple.


Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar