Today , my course will held debate compatiton between intermadiate student. The motion is Drug distributor and Consumer drug Should get Death Sentence. Do you agree with the Motion ??
I will be affirmative team so i must to agree with the Motion. oke may be some of you still dont understand about What is Death Sentence and drug ...?
A
drug is, in the broadest of terms, a
chemical substance that has known biological effects on
humans or other
animals.
[5] Foods are generally excluded from this definition, in spite of their physiological effects on animal species.
[6][7][8]
In
pharmacology,
a drug is "a chemical substance used in the treatment, cure,
prevention, or diagnosis of disease or used to otherwise enhance
physical or mental well-being."
[6] Pharmaceutical drugs may be used for a limited duration, or on a regular basis for
chronic disorders.
[9]
Psychoactive drugs are chemical substances that affect the function of the nervous system, altering
perception,
mood or
consciousness.
[10] Alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine are the most widely consumed psychoactive drugs worldwide.
[11]
Capital punishment, death penalty or execution is punishment by death. The sentence that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term
capital originates from the
Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (referring to execution by beheading)
Capital punishment has, in the past, been practiced by most
societies, as a punishment for criminals, and political or religious
dissidents. Historically, the carrying out of the death sentence was
often accompanied by torture, and executions were most often
public
some poeple disagree with this because some reason. accourding to Debate.org this is their reson
Waste of a life and lots of other points
First of all, drug
dealing is a crime that involves the unauthorised sale of certain
consumable substances, such as marijuana and heroin. A drug dealer is a
person who sells the controlled substances. The unauthorised sale of
prescription medication can also be considered as drug dealing, and in
some cases may be a major problem in some communities, which is why a
punishment should most definitely be given to the dealer, but the
question is should we really be executing these people for only selling
the drug, and instead giving a punishment?
Elaborating on the point
made now, which is also one of my points to make, in certain countries
illegal importing, exporting, sale or possession of drugs constitute
capital offences that may result in the death penalty. According to a
2011 article by the Lawyers Collective, and NGO in India, they say that,
’32 countries impose capital punishment for offences involving narcotic
drugs and psychotropic substances.’ So my point to make here is that,
once again there is no reason to execute people who were only doing an
act that was illegal. To elaborate further, let’s take for example that a
man murdered another man, then the murderer would be taken to jail for
the rest of their life, and might come out of jail in 20 years rather
than their whole life…. So if you think about the murderer had killed
someone and yet was not executed…but If we take the drug dealer they
would be executed for doing a small illegal act.
Now to my second
point regarding the topic, about what happens when the drug is
legalised. When the drug is legalised, law enforcement realise that if
the drug dealer lived longer, their crime wouldn’t be real. Unless that
person had committed mass murder. As I was saying earlier, there isn’t
really a reason for the execution of a minor criminal who sold an
illicit substance. So therefore the death penalty for drug dealers is
not valid.
So to recap briefly on what I was talking about, drug
dealers convicted of distributing large amounts of drugs should not
receive the death penalty, because people should only receive the death
penalty for taking life or, in some cases, attempting to. Though
convicted of committing a major crime, it would be wrong for these drug
dealers to receive capital punishment. This gives them no chance to
regret and make a contribution to society.
And also, how does that
benefit anyone?, executing someone for a minor criminal act, should
definitely not be a reason for execution.
This is a victimless crime - education and rehabilitation are needed for all.
Drugs
are a choice. Where there is demand there is supply! So killing drug
dealers/traffickers is not the answer. The answer is in a good sound
education from a young age. This will lift them out of poverty status
and give them a better income to support themselves and their families
as well as bring up children who are educated and know the good from the
bad. For drug addicts, rehabilitation is the answer. They would need
help from their Government as well as other donors to help facilitate
the building of rehabilitation centers and for people who have had that
past drug experience to educate the addicts and give them a sense of
purpose to stop them from using again.
and many other...
this is the argemet from agree poeple.
Drug Dealers Know Their Product Can And Will Kill
I fully
admit that drug addicts are the ones that choose to inflict illegal
narcotics upon themselves, but drug dealers are most definitely part of
the problem. They take advantage of people's weaknesses, exploit the
peer pressure that children and young adults are subjected to, do
whatever they can to sell a productive that can and most likely will
leave a person hopelessly addicted to their poisons for the rest of
their lives. Lives that are dramatically shortened by said poisons.
Dealers know they are part of the problem, and do not care. And if they
won't stop pushing their poisons, then they must be stopped by any means
necessary.
Execute meth dealers/manufacturers.
Drugs are designed to
prey on the weakness of people. Certain drugs are less problematic
than others. I would say execute only the meth and crack/cocaine
dealers. Meth first if I had my option. A meth dealer or
manufacturer is a person without any morals or self-worth. They're
selling a product that entices stealing, anger, self-loathing, and
extreme addiction. If we had less people selling the stuff, we would
have less people on the stuff. Which would mean less crime, less petty
theft and violence.